I’ve been listening to The Beatles a lot lately, and just finished Hunter Davies’ book on their golden era, from the beginning through 1968.This was the only guy that was given complete access to the Fab Four during that time and he traveled with them for a long time and got to know them pretty well. He interviewed all the family members, and even Pete Best, and compiled a wealth of personal information on the group and their lives coming from the rough neighborhoods of post-WWII Liverpool.
After I finished the book and listened to their catalog (I have a rotten commute and a lot of time to listen) I’ve decided that The Beatles phenomenon was simply nothing more than “right place, right time”. The world was ready for something a little more daring than the sappy pulp the Beach Boys were passing around. The surf music scene didn’t appeal to anyone that didn’t live near a coast. The burgeoning folk music scene was too mellow; Elvis was back and forth at this time between sappy love songs and what-not. Chuck Berry and Jerry Lee Lewis were churning out song after song that sounded exactly the same.
The time was right for a revolution in rock and roll and The Beatles just happened to be there.
The Beatles honed their style in Hamburg Germany, where they played 5 sets a day, up to 12 hours per day. They pretty much were a cover band at that time, rehashing old blues tunes and mixing in a few original compositions. Most of their early original songs were just love-story slop if you get right down to it. The lyrics are just a bunch of “I love you, she loves you, we love you, blah blah blah yeah yeah yeah”. The thing that won them fans was the energy and the style. They played with such a different style and performed with a collective energy that no one had seen before, and the world was ready for it.
By the time that Ringo joined them and they signed with EMI, they were so efficient with their songs that they blasted them out in the studio in just a few days. The hype machine helped them, and Brian Epstein was a master of promotion. Beatlemania followed, but it was more out of a lust for the boys than a lust for their music.
Their music was different, no doubt. The frenzy and mania over the group was unprecedented. Still, the first few albums were just a lot of sap. Love songs for the teeny-bopper. It paved the way though for more experimental stuff, and their music seemed to grow with their audience. By the time they came out with the white album, their core audience, the ones that had fallen over and fainted at the site of them, was smoking dope, holding peace rallies and using the Beatles music as a rallying point.
It is almost like no one really sat down and listened and tried to understand the lyrics at all. I mean, the first 4 albums are pretty much the same song, over and over, with a different beat and tempo. The subject is the same at least, only worked different. Rubber Soul, Revolver, and Sgt Peppers are honestly the only revolutionary albums the Beatles truly gave us, and even there, some of the songs are just rehashed ego trips. By the time Magical Mystery Tour dropped, John was so weird that none of his songs made sense, and he didn’t care. I fully believe that in the back of his mind, he said, I can put out whatever tripe I want and these numbskulls will buy it and call me a genius. How else do you explain the lyrics for I am the Walrus?
Seriously though, they have had flashes of honest-to-goodness brilliance, where the lyrics and the music came together and created magic, but hasn’t that happened to nearly every band that has been signed?
The Beatles were set free to experiment in ways other bands never dreamed of, and they had that early on due to all the screaming success of the first albums. That experimentation has been hailed by critics and fans as the epitome of rock and roll. I agree somewhat that it changed the direction of music, but if it hadn’t been them, I really believe someone else would have. Brian Wilson had a good shot in 1966 with Pet Sounds, and has actually been credited with pushing the Beatles in that direction. If you listen to Sgt Peppers, you will hear the Brian Wilson sound all through that album. The only problem was that Brian wrote love songs. The world was still looking for something different. Revolver and Sgt Pepper’s were different and so the Beatles gained even more leverage.
Their last several albums though were pretty much brain dumping, and they really didn’t care about each other at that time and they really didn’t care about The Beatles. If you listening close enough, it’s obvious they are carrying on simply because it was expected. None of them wanted to be there, and that’s why they started recording their own stuff without the others being around. John’s music in Abbey Road, Let It Be, and the White Album is some of the worst crap that the Beatles recorded. George was so into his peace and love Indian phase that his music makes your teeth hurt. Paul was the only one still trying to pound out good rock and roll songs, or at the least, decent pop tunes. To me, this era for Paul was just the beginning of his Wings period. The songs that Wings pumped out were the same as the late Beatles McCartney songs.
Paul caught and still catches the most grief over the Beatles breakup. It’s a little unfair because in reality, he was the only one that really wanted the band to continue on, and he was fighting for that until the end. John wanted to be elsewhere, George wanted to be on a different spiritual plane, and Ringo just wanted to go.
Despite all of this, what I’ve read over the last several years, what I’ve listened too, and what I’ve written, I still love the Beatles and can listen to them any time of day. I just do it now with a more realistic view of what they were about and what their music means.